GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR v. FLOYD

Docket No. 97311.

447 Mich. 422 (1994)

523 N.W.2d 227

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR v. FLOYD

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided November 1, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip J. Thomas, Grievance Administrator, Jane Shallal, Deputy Grievance Administrator, and Charles K. Higle, Associate Counsel, Attorney Grievance Commission, for the petitioner.


PER CURIAM:

The issue in this case is whether the provisions of MCR 9.119 are applicable to a lawyer who has been automatically suspended under MCR 9.128(A) for failure to pay costs associated with a discipline proceeding. The Attorney Discipline Board held that MCR 9.119 is inapplicable. We reverse this determination, and remand the case to the board for further proceedings.

I

In 1990, respondent Seymour...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases