1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 205 A.D.2d
  5. 205 A.D.2d 663 (1994)
 

GEFRARD v. E.W. BLISS CO.

205 A.D.2d 663 (1994)

614 N.Y.S.2d 300

Lutner Gefrard et al., Plaintiffs, v. E.W. Bliss Company, Defendants, and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Pinquist Tool & Die Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendants; Mead Fluid Dynamics et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 20, 1994

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion for summary judgment of Mead Fluid Dynamics, et al. (hereinafter Mead) because Pinquist Tool & Die Co., Inc. (hereinafter Pinquist) raised triable issues of fact, such as whether the punch press was equipped with a CSV-105 hand operated activation device at the time of the accident, whether the device was defective, and whether that defect caused the

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases