Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.
The defendant's contentions that the Supreme Court's supplemental instructions created the impression that the identification of the defendant was an established fact and unfairly marshaled the evidence of misidentification are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Stewart,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.