1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 842 F.Supp.
  5. 842 F.Supp. 20 (1994)
 

U.S. v. SMYTH

Crim. No. 93-12 SSH.

842 F.Supp. 20 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America v. Paul P. SMYTH, John E. Adamson, Gregory L. deMesones, Marion R. Ennis, Jr., Shah J. Karim, Thomas A. McGeady, Joseph Spriggs, III, James R. Burns, Luis A. Castillo, Ronald Lovelace, and Albert G. Reese, Jr.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 31, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katherin Winfree, Virginia Cheatham, Christine E. Sykes, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, DC, for U.S.

Jonathan Shapiro, Shapiro & Associates, Alexandria, VA, Stephen G. Cochran, Cochran & Rathbun, McLean, VA, for Smyth.

Plato Cacheris, Philip T. Inglima, Cacheris & Treanor, Washington, DC, for Adamson.

Bernard Grimm, Washington, DC, for deMesones.

Eugene M. Propper, T. Scott Wilkinson, Washington, DC, for Ennis.

Hamilton P. Fox, III, Lovida H. Coleman, Jr., Erin K. Monoghan, Washington, DC, for Karim.

Joseph R. Caldwell, Jr., Lisa D. Burget, Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, Washington, DC, for McGeady.

Michael Rosier, Patricia A. Moore (pro hac vice) Ronald Wright, Washington, DC, for Spriggs.

Henry W. Asbill, Timothy D. Junkin, L. Barrett Boss, Washington, DC, for Burns.

Francis D. Carter, Washington, DC, for Castillo.

Earl J. Silbert, Adam S. Hoffinger, Schwalf, Donnenfeld, Bray & Silbert, Washington, DC, for Lovelace.

Jonathan D. Schiller, Donovan, Leisure, Rogovin & Schiller, Margaret Miller, Washington, DC, for Reese.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court are the proposed individual theory of defense instructions of defendants Smyth, Adamson, deMesones, Karim, Castillo, Lovelace, and Reese. These instructions were submitted on Friday, January 14, 1994, during and after the formal statement of objections to the Court's formulation of the jury instructions. On January 21, the Court denied defendants' requests to include those instructions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases