INK v. GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.


537 Pa. 325 (1994)

643 A.2d 673

Shawn L. INK, and Michael S. Sensenich, Appellants, v. GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORPORATION, Metropolitan Edison Company, Pennsylvania Power & Light Company, S.J. Ball Construction Co., Ball Builders, Inc., New Home Financial Services, Inc., Theodore and Edith Ludwig, husband and wife, Spring Township, Alum-A-Pole Corporation, and H.A. Building Products of Williamsport, Inc., t/a H.A. Building Products, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided June 30, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Schuster, West Chester, for appellants.

C. Kent Price, Harrisburg, for H.A. Bldg. Products.

Charles W. Craven, Philadelphia, for Alum-A-Pole Corp.

Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY, CASTILLE and MONTEMURO, JJ.


ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases