Petitioners (defendants below and their attorney) seek a writ to vacate an order sanctioning them for failing to personally attend a mediation session and requiring them to participate in further mediation. Plaintiffs, real parties in interest, respond by urging us to rule that once an attorney orally agrees to mediate a dispute neither that attorney nor the client
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
KIRSCHENMAN v. SUPERIOR COURT
Docket No. A066767.
30 Cal.App.4th 832 (1994)
36 Cal. Rptr.2d 166
WAYNE KIRSCHENMAN et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, Respondent; PATRICK B. HAMMONS et al., Real Parties in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 30, 1994.
November 30, 1994.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robert D. Patterson for Petitioners.
Michael R. Sullivan and Steven M. McCarthy for Respondent and for Real Parties in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
