1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 517 N.W.2d
  5. 517 N.W.2d 344 (1994)
 

GADEY v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

No. C0-93-2380.

517 N.W.2d 344 (1994)

Peter GADEY, Carole A. Perko, Paul Perko and Jon Perko, individually and as representatives of all others similarly situated, Respondents, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied August 24, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott J. Otero-Strouts, Jan Stuurmans, Stuurmans & Karan, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Robert J. Alfton, City Atty., William C. Dunning, Kenneth R. Frantz, Asst. City Attys., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, P.J., and HARTEN and STONE, JJ.

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

This court granted discretionary review, thus allowing appellant city to challenge a partial summary judgment ruling that special assessments were improperly levied between 1983 and 1992, and to challenge the remedies provided to respondents for those defective assessments. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

The Assessments

Respondents Peter Gadey, Carole Perko, Paul Perko, and Jon Perko...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases