U.S. v. DEFRIES

Crim. No. 93-117.

858 F.Supp. 1 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, v. C. Eugene DEFRIES, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

July 1, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart A. Levey, Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, Washington, DC, for Clayton Eugene Defries.

Michele A. Roberts, Washington, DC, for Clyde E. Dodson.

Richard Anthony Hibey, Anderson, Hibey & Blair, Washington, DC, for Reinhold Schamann.

Judith Lynne Wheat, Cacheris & Treanor, Washington, DC, for Claude W. Daulley.

Jeffrey Todd Green, Sidley & Austin, Washington, DC, for Alexander C. Cullison.

Donald Thomas Bucklin, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Washington, DC, for Karl M. Landgrebe.

Stuart Fries Pierson, Washington, DC, for Donald K. Masingo.

Penny Marshall, Federal Public Defender for D.C., Washington, DC, for Michael A. Ribera.

James E. Sharp, Paul Lawrence Knight, Sharp & Lankford, Washington, DC, for George Butler, Jr.

Henry Winchester Asbill, Asbill, Junkin & Myers, Chtd., Washington, DC, for William M. Fast.

Thomas E. Scott, Davis, Scott, Weber & Edwards, Miami, FL, for Walter J. Browne.

James E. Sharp, Paul Lawrence Knight, Sharp & Lankford, Washington, DC, for Thaddeus Kedzierski.

Adam S. Hoffinger, Schwalb, Donnenfeld, Bray & Silbert, P.C., Jonathan Seth Zucker, Washington, DC, for Durwin W. Davis.

Jeffrey Todd Green, Sidley & Austin, Washington, DC, for Michael A. Baker.

Steven Carl Tabackman, Perkins & Coie, Washington, DC, for Vincent T. Oliveri.

Francis Darron Carter, Carter & Varrone, Washington, DC, for Paul T. Reyburn.

Daniel Saleem Seikaly, Sr., U.S. Atty's. Office, Sotiris A. Planzos, Stephen Kelly, Richard G. Convertino, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, for U.S.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JACKSON, District Judge.

In this 10-count indictment the government charges 15 former union officials with multiple acts of conspiracy, corruption and racketeering in seizing control of the union and exercising the authority so acquired for their personal benefit.1 Briefly summarized, the indictment alleges that from approximately September, 1984, through January, 1991, the defendants fraudulently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases