Claimant's case was reopened by the Board solely for the purpose of determining whether there was compliance with the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [US Dist Ct, SD NY, Aug. 1, 1983, Carter, J., 79 Civ 5899]). The Board found no substantial procedural violations and therefore adhered to its prior decision finding claimant ineligible to receive benefits. Claimant fails to allege any procedural errors on this appeal and we conclude...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.