Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant asserts that his conviction should be reversed because the prosecutor was allowed to elicit identification testimony which had been suppressed for lack of notice pursuant to CPL 710.30, and to comment upon that testimony in summation. His contention is unpreserved for appellate review because he failed to object to the witness's testimony or express dissatisfaction with the curative instructions given by the court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.