Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The court did not act improvidently in denying the petitioners' application for leave to serve a late notice of claim. Not only did the petitioners fail to proffer a satisfactory explanation for the delay in seeking leave to serve a late notice of claim (see, Matter of Piotrowski v Onteora Cent. School Dist.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.