1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 167 Pa.Commw.
  5. 167 Pa.Commw. 672 (1994)
 

GAROFOLO v. COM., DEPT. OF REVENUE

167 Pa.Commw. 672 (1994)

648 A.2d 1329

GAROFOLO, CURTISS, LAMBERT & MACLEAN, INC. (formerly Garofolo, Curtiss & Company, Inc.) for itself and for all similarly situated corporations, Petitioners v. COMMONWEALTH Of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided September 30, 1994.

Reargument Denied October 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred W. Putnam, Jr., for petitioners.

Kevin A. Moury, for respondent.

Before McGINLEY and FRIEDMAN, JJ., and RODGERS, Senior Judge.

RODGERS,1 Senior Judge.

In July 1992, Garofolo, Curtiss, Lambert & MacLean (Garofolo), a Pennsylvania corporation and a management consulting firm specializing in executive search services, filed a petition for review in our original jurisdiction, against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, asking this Court to declare Section 16 of Act 222, suspending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases