Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The court did not err in denying suppression of identification testimony. Under the circumstances of this case, the People's hearsay evidence at the Wade hearing was sufficient (see, CPL 710.60 [4]) to establish that nothing suggestive was said to the victim of the robbery when he was brought to the precinct to view the lineup. The defendant presented no evidence at the hearing to call the People's evidence into...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
