JUGAN v. FRIEDMAN


275 N.J. Super. 556 (1994)

646 A.2d 1112

JOHN JUGAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STUART FRIEDMAN, M.D., DOROTHY FRIEDMAN, A/K/A DOTTY FRIEDMAN, PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY AND SETH FRIEDMAN, SANDER FRIEDMAN, STEPHEN FRIEDMAN AND JOHN DOES, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 13, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd Brandon Eder argued the cause for appellant (Garruto, Galex & Cantor, attorneys; Mr. Eder, on the brief).

Stuart J. Friedman, M.D. argued the cause for respondent pro se.

No other parties participated in this appeal.

Before Judges DREIER, BROCHIN and KLEINER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BROCHIN, J.A.D.

In September 1984, plaintiff John Jugan commenced an action against defendant Stuart Friedman, M.D., to recover damages for personal injuries which resulted from medical malpractice committed by Dr. Friedman in the fall of 1982. In March 1988, the jury awarded Mr. Jugan compensatory damages of $10,000 and punitive damages of $150,000. No appeal was taken from the judgment entered on that verdict, and Dr. Friedman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases