Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Bank of New York contends that Cusack & Stiles should be disqualified as counsel for United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (hereinafter USF&G) because Cusack & Stiles was simultaneously representing the Bank of New York in Rosenberg v Bank of N. Y., pending in the Supreme Court, New York County, Index No. 2065791, while prosecuting a claim on behalf of USF&G against the Bank of New York...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.