1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 204 A.D.2d
  5. 204 A.D.2d 609 (1994)
 

McKIM v. FROBAR INV. CO.

204 A.D.2d 609 (1994)

614 N.Y.S.2d 224

Isabelle E. McKim, Appellant, v. Frobar Investment Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, and Gioncondo Dipietro et al., Respondents. Asea, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 23, 1994

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents.

On appeal, the plaintiff contends that the court's charge to the jury was erroneous and denied her a fair trial. However, none of the alleged errors are preserved for appellate review. In any event, the charge as a whole properly instructed the jury on the applicable principles of law (see, Fleischer v Melmarkets, Inc.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases