PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's revocation of appellant's probation for all three of the alleged violations. Although the third amended violation, L4, was mislabeled L5, appellant clearly had notice of the specifics of the violation and testified as to the L4 subject matter. Moreover, his failure to follow supervisory instructions given by his probation officer was a proper ground for revocation of probation. Goley v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
