ROWE v. HYATT

No. 2273.

452 S.E.2d 356 (1994)

Roger D. ROWE and Mitchalene Rowe, Appellants, v. Ken HYATT and Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., d/b/a Ken Hyatt Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided December 19, 1994.

Rehearing Denied January 19, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Duncan S. McIntosh and Grady L. Patterson, III, both of Quinn, Arndt, Patterson & McIntosh, Columbia, for appellants.

S. Jahue Moore, of Kirkland, Wilson, Moore, Allen, Deneen & Taylor, West Columbia, for respondents.


CONNOR, Judge:

The Rowes appeal the trial court's ruling which granted Ken Hyatt individually a directed verdict under the Unfair Trade Practices Act and the Regulation of Manufacturers, Distributors and Dealers Act (Dealers Act). We affirm the directed verdict on the Unfair Trade Practices Act and reverse and remand on the Dealers Act.

The Rowes bought a car from Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth. They claim the dealership represented the car to be a 1987 demonstrator...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases