1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 276 N.J.
  5. 276 N.J. Super. 531 (1994)
 

LAUTEK CORP. v. IMAGE BUSINESS SYS.

276 N.J. Super. 531 (1994)

648 A.2d 488

LAUTEK CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNOR TO LAMBDA FINANCIAL SERVICE CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. IMAGE BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 18, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miriam E. Cahn argued the cause for appellant, cross-respondent (Eichler, Forgosh, Gottilla & Rudnick, attorneys; Ms. Cahn, on the brief).

David B. Zolotorofe argued the cause for respondent, cross-appellant (Goldman, Zolotorofe & Corcoran, attorneys; Mr. Zolotorofe, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, DREIER and WEFING.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Lautek Corporation, by its assignee, Lambda Financial Service Corp., appeals from four aspects of a final judgment entered in its favor in the amount of $85,588.41 after a bench trial. Defendant, Image Business Systems Corporation (IBS), has cross-appealed from a discovery order entered by an earlier motion judge (not the eventual trial judge) and from the arithmetic calculation of the judgment entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases