KROGNESS v. BEST BUY CO., INC.

No. C3-94-861.

524 N.W.2d 282 (1994)

Stephen KROGNESS, individually and d/b/a Krogness Real Estate and Krogness Investments, Appellant, v. BEST BUY CO., INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 29, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Gilbert, Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd., Minnetonka, for appellant.

Mark D. Wisser, Alfred H. Edwall, Jr., Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, P.J., and LANSING and HUSPENI, JJ.


OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

On appeal from a summary judgment, Stephen Krogness argues that the district court erred in (1) finding that he was not entitled to a commission on a real estate sale under the parties' express contract or under theories of implied contract or quasi-contract and (2) granting summary judgment when a fact dispute existed as to whether respondent Best Buy Company breached the parties' contract. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases