1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 639 N.E.2d
  5. 639 N.E.2d 164 (1994)
 

MADDOX v. ROZEK

No. 1-93-1835.

639 N.E.2d 164 (1994)

265 Ill.App.3d 1007

203 Ill.Dec. 125

Collis MADDOX, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward S. ROZEK, Defendant-Appellant.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division.

August 11, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wein & Associates, P.C., Chicago (Arthur Z. Handelman, of Counsel), for appellant.

Jeffrey D. Schultz, Chicago (Martin J. O'Hearn, of Counsel), for appellee.

Justice CAHILL delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant appeals the decision of the trial court to instruct the jury on the future pain and suffering of the plaintiff even though expert testimony was not introduced in support. The jury signed a verdict form that awarded the plaintiff $10,000 for past and future pain and suffering. We hold that the nature of the plaintiff's injury requires expert testimony to support an instruction on future pain and suffering...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases