1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 185 Wis.2d
  5. 185 Wis.2d 609 (1994)
 

GULL v. VAN EPPS

No. 93-0710.

185 Wis.2d 609 (1994)

517 N.W.2d 531

Jerome E. GULL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ruth VAN EPPS, and David L. Werth, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided May 19, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Edmund C. Carns of Hughes Mathewson Carns & Slattery of Oshkosh.

For the defendants-respondents the cause was submitted on the briefs of John R. Teetaert and Robert N. Duimstra of Menn, Nelson, Sharratt, Teetaert & Beisenstein, Ltd. of Appleton.

Before Gartzke, P.J., Dykman and Sundby, JJ.

SUNDBY, J.

In this case we decide that the law partnership of Van Epps, Gull and Werth continued after dissolution solely for the purpose of winding up the affairs of the partnership. Therefore, the withdrawing partner, plaintiff-appellant Jerome E. Gull, is not entitled to share in fees from new business earned by Van Epps and Werth during the winding up of the partnership affairs. However, as to work in progress at the time of dissolution of the partnership, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases