1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 641 So.2d
  5. 641 So.2d 145 (1994)
 

LEE v. PAXSON

No. 94-162.

641 So.2d 145 (1994)

Donald E. LEE, Appellant, v. Wesley C. PAXSON, Sr., and Paxson Electric Company, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Rehearing Denied August 17, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth Friedland of Holland, Starling, Severs, Stadler & Friedland, P.A., Titusville, for appellant.

John W. Caven, Jr., and Charles B. Bennett, Jr., of Caven, Clark, Ray & Tucker, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

GRIFFIN, J., concurs specially and dissents, with opinion.

GRIFFIN, Judge, concurring in part; dissenting in part.

I concur in the affirmance of dismissal of count III of the complaint alleging fraud in the inducement to enter into the oral, multiyear employment agreement. Appellees' argument that the economic loss rule bars the fraudulent inducement claim is specious;

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases