CELLUCCI v. BRONSTEIN


277 N.J. Super. 506 (1994)

649 A.2d 1333

CARLO G. CELLUCCI, JR., AND SALLY CELLUCCI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. RONALD W. BRONSTEIN, AND NUSBAUM, STEIN, GOLDSTEIN AND BRONSTEIN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 6, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Vort argued the cause for appellants (James F. Carney, attorney; Mr. Vort, of counsel and on the brief).

Christopher J. Carey argued the cause for respondents (Tompkins, McGuire & Wachenfeld, attorneys; Mr. Carey, of counsel; Mr. Carey and Nadia M. Walker, on the brief).

Before Judges MUIR, Jr., D'ANNUNZIO, and EICHEN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by MUIR, Jr., J.A.D.

This appeal stems from an order granting defendants' motion for involuntary dismissal of plaintiffs' legal malpractice complaint at the close of all evidence. The underlying theory of plaintiffs' complaint was that defendant Ronald Bronstein not only negligently filed a workers' compensation petition rather than a negligence action against Bud's Bar & Liquor, Inc., thereby diminishing the scope of recoverable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases