Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his right to be present was violated because challenges to prospective jurors were exercised outside of his presence is without merit. The defendant waived the recording of the voir dire. Therefore, he cannot now claim that the silence of the record as to how the challenges were exercised supports his claim that his right to be present was violated.
The defendant's contention that the photographs...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
