Defendant contends on this appeal that he was denied his right to a speedy trial under CPL 30.20 and the US Constitution. Review of the factors considered in determining constitutional speedy trial issues lead us to conclude that defendant was not denied a speedy trial in this case. Although defendant was incarcerated for almost one year prior to his plea, part of this delay was caused by defendant's actions in twice substituting counsel. Further, defendant has shown no specific...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
