1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 69 Ohio
  5. 69 Ohio St.3d 693 (1994)
 

STATE EX REL. DOMJANCIC v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 93-1629.

69 Ohio St.3d 693 (1994)

THE STATE EX REL. DOMJANCIC, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; ITT GRINNELL CORPORATION, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 27, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weiner & Suit Co., L.P.A., and Dale A Nowak, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn, Robert D. Weisman and William J. Barath, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Per Curiam.

Three questions are presented: (1) Did the commission abuse its discretion by relying on Dr. Gonzalez's report? (2) Did the commission abuse its discretion in not considering Ruth's vocational evaluation? and (3) Does the order satisfy Noll? For the reasons to follow, we answer "no" to each question.

Claimant advances four challenges to Dr. Gonzalez's report, none of which has meritClaimant initially claims that the order violates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases