Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the petitioners' application for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5).
The petitioners' application was made one month after the 90-day period within which to serve a notice of claim had expired. The proposed notice of claim submitted with the application was sufficiently specific to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
