Ordered that the appeal from the order entered June 13, 1991, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated December 17, 1991, made upon reargument; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated December 17, 1991, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
We conclude that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiffs...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.