Ordered that the appeal from the order entered July 8, 1992, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order made upon reargument; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated November 12, 1992, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the petitioner leave to serve a late notice of claim (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.