1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 17 F.3d
  5. 17 F.3d 723 (1994)
 

U.S. v. SCHULTZ

No. 92-2828.

17 F.3d 723 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tom SCHULTZ and James Chaplin, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 10, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Bevans, Houston, TX (Court-appointed), for Schultz.

Walter E. Herman, III, Humble, TX (Court-appointed), for Chaplin.

Katherine L. Haden, Gaynell G. Jones, U.S. Atty., Paula C. Offenhauser, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for U.S.

Before JOHNSON, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:

Defendants James Chaplin and Tom Schultz were charged in a seventeen-count indictment with criminal acts surrounding a bank fraud scheme. Although a jury found each man guilty of the charged offenses, the Government failed to proffer sufficient evidence of federal jurisdiction. We therefore reverse.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Defendants Chaplin and Schultz were charged along with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases