WARNER CO. v. SUTTON


274 N.J. Super. 464 (1994)

644 A.2d 656

WARNER COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BARBARA SUTTON, AS SECRETARY TO THE MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD; MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD; MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP AND MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND NEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION; NEW JERSEY AUDUBON SOCIETY; AND CITIZENS UNITED TO PROTECT THE MAURICE RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES, INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 24, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Lloyd argued the cause for appellants (Rutgers Environmental Law Clinic, attorneys; Mr. Lloyd and Margaret M. Hayden on the brief).

John B. Kearney argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent Warner Company (Kearney & Brady, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Kearney on the brief).

James J. Seeley argued the cause for defendant-respondent Maurice River Township Planning Board (Seeley & Jones, P.A., attorneys; Mr. Seeley on the brief).

Richard H. Daniels, attorney for respondents Maurice River Township and Maurice River Township Committee, joins in the brief submitted and argument of counsel on behalf of respondent Maurice River Township Planning Board (Mr. Daniels on the letter in lieu of brief).

Before Judges HAVEY, ARNOLD M. STEIN and ARIAL A. RODRIGUEZ.


The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D.

The issue in this case is whether a Law Division judge, by consent order, may approve the settlement of land use litigation without a hearing and without the municipality adopting amendments to the zoning ordinance implementing the settlement terms. We conclude that the consent order entered here, which alters substantially the present zoning ordinance as to permitted uses and density, must be implemented by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases