Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The evidence adduced at the hearing established, by competent proof, that the appellant willfully violated the order of protection (see, Family Ct Act § 846-a) when he entered the petitioner's garage to retrieve some property.
The appellant has already served his sentence, and therefore the issue of whether it was harsh or excessive is academic (see, People v Mathison...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
