VOGEL v. HOCHHALTER

No. C0-93-2119.

516 N.W.2d 214 (1994)

Carol VOGEL, Appellant, v. Don HOCHHALTER, d/b/a Viking Inn, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied July 27, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Malters, Worthington, for appellant.

Philip J. Danen, Rolf E. Sonnesyn, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by DAVIS, P.J., and SHORT and KLAPHAKE, JJ.


OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellant Carol Vogel appeals the district court's summary judgment determination that her exclusive remedy for a work-related injury is under Minnesota's Workers' Compensation Act. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Carol Vogel was employed by respondent Don Hochhalter d/b/a Viking Inn when she injured her ankle while pushing a laundry cart. At the time of the injury, Hochhalter was not covered by workers' compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases