Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiffs were not entitled to the tolling provision of CPLR 203 (b) in the absence of any evidence that the defendant Steven F. Gass was united in interest with the defendant Burt Gass (see, CPLR 203 [b]; Kavanaugh v Nussbaum,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.