Per Curiam.
This matter is before the court upon defendant-appellee Ray C. Gowdy's motion to reconsider and motion to dismiss this appeal. Gowdy contends that this appeal should be dismissed because it is a discretionary appeal pursuant to R.C. 2945.67(A), and the state did not move for leave to appeal within thirty days of the judgment from which this appeal is taken.
The state contends that the following sentence in App.R. 3(A) is dispositive:
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.