SCHOZER v. WM. PENN LIFE INS.


84 N.Y.2d 639 (1994)

644 N.E.2d 1353

620 N.Y.S.2d 797

Jacqueline Schozer, Respondent, v. William Penn Life Insurance Company of New York, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 6, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bleakley Platt & Schmidt, White Plains (Robert D. Meade of counsel), for appellant.

Kane Kessler, P. C., New York City (S. Reid Kahn and Lauren Topelsohn of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, LEVINE and CIPARICK concur with Judge TITONE; Judges SIMONS and SMITH dissent and vote to affirm in separate opinions.


TITONE, J.

In this action to recover life insurance proceeds, we are called upon to determine whether the trial court properly barred the admission of an X-ray report, recorded by a physician as part of the underwriting process, and expert medical testimony concerning the physician's impression of the X ray, where the underlying X-ray film was unavailable at trial. Because the courts below improperly concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases