OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant contends that the trial court erroneously interpreted the statute governing the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund when it dismissed appellant's claim to change his election of disability benefits. The specific language of appellant's retirement benefit agreement, the applicable statute, and Minnesota case law prohibit a retiree from changing the terms of the retirement allowance once retirement has begun. We affirm.<...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
