1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 516 N.W.2d
  5. 516 N.W.2d 203 (1994)
 

DANIELSON v. CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK

No. C5-93-2228.

516 N.W.2d 203 (1994)

Donald D. DANIELSON, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK, Minnesota, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied July 27, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Ballentine, Michael D. Tewksbury, Schwebel, Goetz, Sieben, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellants.

John J. Brossart and Lawrence R. King, King and Hatch, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and HUSPENI and MULALLY, JJ.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Donald and Ruby Danielson challenge the trial court's award of summary judgment to the City of Brooklyn Park (City). Because we agree with the trial court that the City owed no special duty to the Danielsons that would render it liable for any negligence based upon the City's incorrect determination that the Danielsons' tree was infected with Dutch Elm disease, we affirm.

FACTS

The facts in this case are undisputed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases