KING v. JONES

No. 91-CV-416.

647 A.2d 64 (1994)

Ethan KING, Appellant, v. Harold JONES, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided September 1, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen L. Braga, Washington, DC and Ethan King, pro se, for appellant.

Michael Brand, Washington, DC, with whom Leonard C. Collins, Kenneth J. Loewinger, and David K. Lietz were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and FERREN, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, and KING, Associate Judges.


PER CURIAM:

King, a former tenant of the premises in question, appeals from a judgment of possession for the landlord, Jones, entered because of King's failure to comply with a protective order requiring him to pay $475.00 per month into the court registry while Jones's suit for possession was pending. King argues that the notice to cure or vacate was defective in that it failed to contain information which both a statute and a regulation

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases