Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that Michele Martin is equitably estopped from seeking to redate the judgment of divorce nunc pro tunc, due to her knowing participation in a bigamous marriage. One may not profit by his or her own wrong (see, Riggs v Palmer, 115 N.Y. 506).
We additionally find that Rose Martin submitted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.