FARO v. ROMANI

No. 82725.

641 So.2d 69 (1994)

John H. FARO, Petitioner, v. Robert V. ROMANI and Farish, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Rehearing Denied August 25, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Beranek of Aurell, Radey, Hinkle, Thomas & Beranek, Tallahassee, Walter G. Campbell of Krupnick, Campbell, Malone, Roselli, Buser & Slama, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, and Amanda K. Esquibel and Eileen L. Tilghman of Tilghman & Esquibel, P.A., Miami, for petitioner.

S. Emory Rogers of Farish, Farish & Romani, West Palm Beach, for respondents.

C. Rufus Pennington, III of Margol & Pennington, P.A., Jacksonville, amicus curiae for The Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers.

Daniel S. Pearson of Holland & Knight, Miami, amicus curiae for Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.


McDONALD, Senior Justice.

We review Faro v. Romani, 629 So.2d 872 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), in which the district court certified the following question of great public importance:

WHETHER IN AN ACTION ON A CHARGING LIEN, A TRIER OF FACT MAY CONCLUDE ON DISPUTED EVIDENCE THAT COUNSEL IS ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES RENDERED, NOTWITHSTANDING THE CONTINGENCY OF THE FEE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases