1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 39 F.3d
  5. 39 F.3d 670 (1994)
 

GRAY v. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE

No. 93-3875.

39 F.3d 670 (1994)

Billy GRAY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided November 10, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Thomas Blankenship (argued and briefed), Blankenship & Robbins, Indianapolis, IN, for petitioner.

Jeffrey Alan Knishkowy, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Stephen M. Reilly (briefed), Raymond Fullerton (argued), Office of Gen. Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC, for respondent.

Before: KRUPANSKY, GUY, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Petitioner appeals a decision of the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture ("Secretary") finding that he violated section 5(2)(B) of the Horse Protection Act ("Act") as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 1824(2)(B). Petitioner argues that the evidence against him is insufficient to support the Secretary's decision and, alternatively, that, even if he did violate the Act, the civil sanctions he was assessed nevertheless ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases