Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In his complaint, the plaintiff alleged, and the evidence established, that his cause of action for recovery of compensation in lieu of unused sick leave, accrued on August 31, 1991 when the defendant school district notified him that he would not be compensated therefor. Notwithstanding the plaintiff's subsequent requests for reconsideration (see, Matter of Maio v New York City Civ. Serv. Commn.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.