1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 453 S.E.2d
  5. 453 S.E.2d 253 (1994)
 

SOIL REMEDIATION CO. v. NU-WAY ENVIRON.

No. 2267.

453 S.E.2d 253 (1994)

SOIL REMEDIATION COMPANY and Yadkin Brick Company, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. NU-WAY ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Respondent, v. CAROLINA EASTMAN DIVISION, a Division of Eastman Kodak Company, Third-Party Defendant, Yeargin, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided December 12, 1994.

Rehearing Denied January 26, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen E. Hudson and R. Scott Tewes, both of Kilpatrick & Cody, of Atlanta, GA, for appellant.

W. Thomas Lavender, Jr., and Russell T. Burke, both of Nexsen, Pruet, Jacobs & Pollard, Columbia, for respondent.

GOOLSBY, Judge:

The dispositive issue in this appeal by Yeargin Inc. from an order denying its motion to compel Nu-Way Environmental, Inc. to arbitrate their contractual dispute concerns whether a notice of arbitration that appears at the top of the first page of the contract between the parties satisfies the requirements of South Carolina Code Ann. § 15-48-10(a) (Supp.1993). We hold it does so and reverse.

The notice in question is printed, not typed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases