Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that his case should have been severed from the codefendant's case because of "antagonistic defenses" is unpreserved for appellate review as the defendant neither submitted a written severance motion nor otherwise presented this claim to the trial court (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v McGee,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.