1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 182 Wis.2d
  5. 182 Wis.2d 500 (1994)
 

NORTH LAKE MANAGEMENT DIST. v. DNR

No. 93-1958.

182 Wis.2d 500 (1994)

513 N.W.2d 703

NORTH LAKE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Respondent-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided March 16, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the petitioner-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of H. Stanley Riffle and Eric O. Schlieter of Arenz, Molter, Macy & Riffle, S.C. of Waukesha.

On behalf of the respondent-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Frank D. Remington, assistant attorney general.

Before Brown, Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ.

BROWN, J.

North Lake Management District argues that § 227.42, STATS., grants it the right to a contested case hearing regarding the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Because the supreme court has decided that the Department of Natural Resources has the discretion whether to hold a contested case hearing in determining the need for an EIS, we affirm the trial court.

The District is responsible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases