1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 69 Ohio
  5. 69 Ohio St.3d 611 (1994)
 

FREEMAN v. NORFOLK & W. RY. CO.

No. 93-280.

69 Ohio St.3d 611 (1994)

FREEMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 27, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., and W. Patrick Murray; Williams & Williams Co., L.P.A., and Mark R. Williams, for appellants.

Robison, Curphey & O'Connell, Jack Zouhary and Jean Ann S. Sieler, for appellees.

Law Offices of Paul O. Scott and Paul O. Scott; Schulman, Mestel & Burick Co., L.P.A., and Alan Schulman, Jr., urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

MOYER, C.J.

This case presents the question whether the trial court erred when it refused to submit to the jury a particular interrogatory requested by the defendant. For the reasons stated herein, we hold that the trial court did not err, and consequently we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.

The interrogatory requested by Norfolk & Western stated:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases