1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 271 N.J.
  5. 271 N.J. Super. 409 (1994)
 

ROYAL INS. CO. v. RUTGERS CAS.

271 N.J. Super. 409 (1994)

638 A.2d 924

ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, AND SHERRI L. DAVIDSON, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 22, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan L. Moreinis argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company.

James A. Mullen, Jr. argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant Royal Insurance Company (Montano, Summers, Mullen, Manuel, Owens & Gregorgio, attorneys; Mr. Mullen, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, SKILLMAN and WEFING.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Defendant Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company (Rutgers) appeals and plaintiff Royal Insurance Company (Royal) cross-appeals from a summary judgment of the Law Division that (1) declared that Rutgers and Royal shall equally pay an underinsured motorist arbitration award and post-judgment interest to defendant Sherri L. Davidson (Ms. Davidson) and (2) ordered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases