1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 274 N.J.
  5. 274 N.J. Super. 405 (1994)
 

CIRCLE CHEVROLET CO. v. GH & C.

274 N.J. Super. 405 (1994)

644 A.2d 626

CIRCLE CHEVROLET COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION AND THOMAS J. DEFELICE, SR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GIORDANO, HALLERAN & CIESLA, A P.C., AND PETRICS, MESKIN, NASSAUR & DAMBACH, ACCOUNTANTS AND AUDITORS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 16, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald L. Lueddeke argued the cause for appellants.

Richard L. Friedman argued the cause for respondent, Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.A. (Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, attorneys; Lawrence J. Sharon, on the brief).

Christopher J. Carey argued the cause for respondent Petrics, Meskin & Nassaur f/k/a Petrics, Meskin, Nassaur & Dambach (Tompkins, McGuire & Wachenfield, attorneys; Michael S. Miller, on the brief).

Before Judges BRODY, STERN and KEEFE.

KEEFE, J.A.D.

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial judge erred in dismissing plaintiffs' professional negligence suit against the law firm of Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C., (GH & C) and the accounting firm of Petrics, Meskin, Nassaur & Dambach (Petrics) because it was barred by the entire controversy doctrine. For the reasons stated herein, we conclude that the trial judge did not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases